Post-Award Playbook Framework
There has been a progressive evolution in the Higher Education market, with the rules of engagement shifting without notice. From a research perspective, this shift was not an overnight occurrence, but the effects are felt across industries just the same. Institutions are facing enrollment pressure, scrutiny over tuition, and questions about the return on investment of every dollar. Procurement teams are expected to find savings and manage risk while also advancing institutional priorities such as access, equity, and supplier diversity. We are past the point of wiggle room for making purchases through creative funding means or shifting plans to accommodate new tools or resources.
Recent analyses of higher education procurement point to a familiar pattern. Procurement offices are being asked to shift from transactional purchasing to strategic sourcing, with greater emphasis on total cost of ownership, data security, and contract performance over time. At the same time, there is a push to increase supplier diversity and include smaller, local, and historically underrepresented firms, even though these suppliers often report that the path into the higher education market is oblique. The fact remains, organizations need a deeper understanding of the institutional context to demonstrate how their solution will advance the college or university’s strategic priorities, deliver strong ROI, and reduce administrative burden.
Many vendors come into higher education after working in the K–12 or commercial sectors and are surprised by the number of stakeholders and the length of the buying cycle. A single RFP may involve faculty committees, IT security teams, legal counsel, procurement, and senior administrators.
Surveys of higher education procurement professionals show several consistent pain points: capacity constraints in procurement offices, challenges aligning purchases with institutional strategy, and a desire for stronger partnerships with vendors rather than one-off transactions. Vendors feel the same constraints from the other side, particularly when they are unclear about how decisions are made or how to position their offerings. Vendors who frame their responses as the beginning of a multi-year partnership, rather than a single sale, align more closely with the direction many institutions are trying to move.
Post-Award Playbook Framework
- Continuity — carry forward the promises, tone, and clarity of the proposal.
- Predictability — create consistent routines for communication, reporting, and support.
- Evidence — collect and share data early to validate the partnership.
- Transparency — address challenges proactively and document decisions.
- Partnership — treat the contract as a shared effort toward district outcomes, not a transaction.
Proposal work demands speed, precision, and the ability to translate complex work into a narrative that evaluators can trust. Delivery work requires steadiness, consistency, and a deeper understanding of operational realities. When the award is announced, the organization must shift from one rhythm to another, and this cannot be done without scalable systems and successful cross-departmental collaboration.
Proposal teams possess the history of the opportunity, which is often siloed, leaving sales reps lost or worse, getting on an implementation call unprepared and misinformed. RFP Teams have deep knowledge of what mattered to evaluators, which concerns surfaced during Q&A, which win themes resonated, and which features gave your solution an advantage. Implementation teams, however, often step into the relationship with limited visibility into that strategic context. There must be a strong communication plan in place, or awards will only turn into lost revenue. Upon receipt of an award notification, a sales hand-off form should be completed and sent to the applicable rep and sales manager. This form ideally lives in your CRM immediately and, in the future, as reps make new relationships and are alerted to existing contracts during their communication with a government agency. Additionally, a request for a meeting with the procurement officer or award contact should be made. This will streamline the process and ensure everyone understands the nature of the award and the next steps.
Research on organizational performance emphasizes that successful companies excel when information flows across functions without delay. In RFP environments, this means more than sharing a contract PDF. It means transferring the intent behind the work: the district’s concerns, the commitments your proposal made, and the nuances that shaped the award.
Integrating Sales, CRM, and Post-Award Intelligence
One of the most significant gaps in many post-award systems is the absence of a structured way to capture and distribute the intelligence gained during the procurement process. CEOs, sales leaders, and proposal teams often gather critical information—emerging partnerships, political dynamics, board concerns, upcoming initiatives—that never reach implementation, marketing, or future proposal writers.
Organizational strategy research in the Harvard Business Review frequently emphasizes that growth depends not on isolated insight but on how well that insight is shared. In RFP ecosystems, the CRM becomes the anchor for that shared learning.
CRM input should capture:
- The themes that resonated during the evaluation The questions evaluators asked most
- The questions evaluators asked most
- Emerging partnerships mentioned in CEO or sales conversations
- Contextual insights about board priorities, site-level needs, or regional politics
- Potential expansion opportunities identified during the procurement process
This information becomes a resource for marketing as they plan outreach to additional sites or departments. It informs sales teams as they identify opportunities for cross-selling or deeper engagement. It guides the implementation team as they anticipate risks or navigate district culture. It helps leadership understand where the contract fits within the district’s broader priorities.
A contract award is an opportunity to strengthen your presence, reputation, and impact across an entire region. When teams treat post-award work as a continuation of strategy using aligned implementation, CRM discipline, rigorous reporting, and intentional cross-team collaboration, they create a foundation that supports renewals, expansions, and future wins. They turn isolated awards into sustainable growth.
Post-Award Checklist
- A quiet, disciplined framework for the first 30–90 days after a win.
The purpose of this checklist is to ensure that everything learned during the RFP process is transferred into implementation with clarity, consistency, and strategic intent. It reflects the practices of organizations that sustain long-term partnerships and convert awards into lasting growth.
1. Internal Handoff & Context Transfer
-
Proposal materials shared internally
Distribute the full winning response, evaluation themes, and submitted attachments to the implementation, product, and leadership teams. -
Capture the “why we won” narrative
Document evaluator comments, Q&A insights, and the themes that shaped the award. This forms the foundation of strong reporting and stable delivery. -
Confirm proposal commitments
Identify any nonstandard commitments, implementation customizations, or specific conditions referenced during the proposal phase.
2. CRM & Knowledge Integration
-
Enter full award intelligence into the CRM
Record the contract value, term, department contacts, site leaders, partnership notes, and contextual insights surfaced during evaluation or CEO/sales conversations. -
Map expansion opportunities
Note related schools, feeder districts, cooperatives, or departments that showed interest. This guides future sales and marketing activity. -
Flag post-award requirements
Identify additional steps needed before implementation (board approvals, IT/security reviews, data sharing agreements, or onboarding tasks).
3. Kick off Planning
-
Align internal teams
Hold a pre-kickoff internal briefing so every department understands the narrative, expectations, and scope before meeting the client. -
Prepare kick off materials
Develop an agenda, roles, timelines, communication structures, and a brief restatement of the district’s goals and constraints. -
Establish norms
Define meeting cadence, escalation pathways, shared workspaces, and primary points of contact.
4. Reporting Infrastructure
-
Define baseline metrics
Identify what constitutes success and how it will be measured—before implementation begins. -
Build the reporting template
Include quantitative data, narrative context, site-by-site observations, and alignment to district goals. -
Schedule reporting cycles
Set dates for monthly or quarterly reviews and confirm who receives which data and in what format.
5. Contract Compliance & Operations
-
Confirm contract requirements
Review deliverables, timelines, invoicing procedures, insurance, staffing commitments, and amendment processes. -
Create a compliance tracker
Document deadlines for reports, site visits, onboarding activities, and data submissions. -
Align staffing and capacity
Ensure team assignments, schedules, and onboarding plans align with the approved scope.
6. Relationship Stewardship
-
Identify district champions
Clarify who asked strong questions, who expressed excitement, and who will influence expansion or renewal. -
Ensure predictable communication
Send early check-ins, clarify meeting cadence preferences, and maintain transparency about challenges. -
Prepare for early wins
Capture positive moments, improvement indicators, and successful implementation milestones to support long-term relational trust.
7. Expansion & Renewal Readiness
-
Track early indicators of value
Document evidence of improved outcomes, reduced burden, or positive staff feedback. -
Socialize successes
Share data and stories with district leaders and, when appropriate, in newsletters, case studies, or internal briefings. -
Plan the renewal timeline
Understand when the district begins budget planning and when renewal discussions need to start.
8. Internal Review Cycle
-
Conduct a 30-day post-award review
Identify gaps in handoffs, reporting, or communication and address them before they escalate. -
Update content library
Incorporate what was learned from the award into future RFP narratives, evidence modules, and alignment language. -
Debrief across teams
Maintain direct collaboration between RFP, sales, implementation, product, and leadership so future work reflects real conditions on the ground
